I remember it was the summer of 1995 when I visited Mario Giacomelli in his hometown of Senigallia.

I remember it was the summer of 1995 when I visited Mario Giacomelli in his hometown of Senigallia, and perceived the contradictions of this 70-year-old man--surrounded by the agency of the aura of a world-renowned photographer living in a small town, still frustrated by the poor sales of his work, famous and at the same time humble, "dumb," as he said, naive, anti-intellectual. You could count that there was some pride in him when his friends christian religioned him in the street and called him "Maestro," further you could also sense that he felt misunderstood and alone with his oeuvre You could diocese his desire to keep working forward new projects, and you awed curiosityed where all that work went. He appeared as a pure romantic in a way, a solitary artist exploring the beauty of a foreign region in central Italy, with abrupt hills and sandy beaches, with amazing moonlight throughout fields of sunflowers. His vision of those landscapes was not a manipulation if it be not that rather the translation of a particular raw geography in Italy into a personal aesthetics of the photographic subl ime.

It is hard to say in a not many words what Giacomelli has meant for Italian photographic agriculture for culture in a broader perception and for contemporary international photography. A comprehensive main division on him has not nevertheless been written; his work is now scattered in various collections, without the possibility of studying his archive as a whole. Giacomelli was always a loner and maybe this is single in kind of the reasons why his work became as well-as; not only-but also; not only-but; not alone-but erratic and neglected. It is hard to frame it within united discourse, one era, one aesthetics.

In 1953 at the surpassingly beginning of his career, he joined the Italian photographic assign places to called "Misa," directed by Giuseppe Cavalli--a collection that favored formalistic experimentation throughout socio-political engagement. Those were the years of Italian neo-realism, of photojournalists engaged in documenting postwar Italy and regional life, of Paul Strand's work in the village of Luzzara that became extremely influential in Italian photographic refinement Living on the periphery and at so early an hour becoming independent from groups and formalistic debates, Giacomelli chose the eternal image of human suffering above the social documents, working in the hospice in Senigallia, examining the progressive alienation of somewhat old people. That body of work, together with the photographs he made at Lourdes (1957-59) and others in a local slaughterhouse (1961) proposes in my mind, the most numerous important imprint of this artist's examination over the years. His beautiful images of landscapes, his famous series of priests (why single in kind wonders, is that series more famous than all the others?) and his photographs of the community at work on the land are the expression of a personal relationship with Nature as an ambiguous Mother--a metaphysical entity who gives and sacrifices a vast, invisible, mysterious appearance It is not by chance that Giacomelli chose sum of two units Italian poets as the main inspirations for his images--the nineteenth-century romantic Giacomo Leopardi (a native of Giacomelli's region) and the postwar existentialist Eugenio Montale. the two Leopardi and Montale (two giants of Italian literature) wrote about nature as a challenge, an illusion, a window to unanswered questions. Giacomelli, a author of poems holding a camera, carried upon the same questions by choosing robust contrasts in his prints, creating a perception of surprise in his portraits of the bulk of mankind (as if they just came into the world) and shaping the image of his native landscapes as vast, infinite worlds in which the work of man becomes a trace of a larger, unknown composition.

This was the man who said that photographs are like scars that common opens and closes in the proces of one's hold self-knowledge, the man who used the camera to stand athwart the path of his own fears, the man who could transform memories into pictures. This was a photographer who knew the loyal alchemy of his medium and used his land to explore it. We are sad that he will not give us modern images, but we feel encouraged, today, to think about those scars and expect at them with the attention that they deserve

MARIA ANTONELLA PELIZZARI is Assistant Curator of Photographs at the Canadian middle point for Architecture in Montreal.

...

Home